mediums, paranormalists, writers & supporters who have
to answer questions and-or debate with closed minded skeptics
in the media).
is essential information when dealing with closed minded
skeptics/materialists. It is taken from some twenty years
of content analysis of debates in afterlife and psi between
‘skeptics’ and psychics-psi empiricists and
other paranormal writers and supporters.
the word ‘skeptic’ is being used too loosely
these days. A ‘skeptic’ is one who questions
and doubts BUT always allows for future possible confirmation.
Many of the important psi (psychic) empiricists are ‘open
minded skeptics’. The professional media skeptics
are better called ‘materialists’ because it
is very clear that a ‘materialist’ is someone
who ABSOLUTELY refuses to accept there can ever be any psi
or the paranormal or the afterlife. You will be doing these
materialists a big favor if you call them ‘skeptics’
Nearly all debunkers who appear on television and radio
are professional materialists – it’s their income,
their living and their reputation which are at stake each
time they appear.
Consistently, it has been shown that those crusading closed-minded
flamboyant debunkers in the media are either promoting their
own careers, (usually in psychology) or doing it for in/direct
funding from the public.
When you are confronted by materialists/debunkers during
some media session be informed that they will try to dominate,
manipulate and misrepresent; they will try to lie, cheat,
mislead, bully - anything to score a cheap point at your
expense. Don’t ever trust them anytime!
If and whenever they come across as saying something in
your favor – it’s like the hangman praising
Don’t be caught unguarded. You must do your reading
about the ‘skeptics.’ Study how they criticize
you and other psychics. You will inevitably find what Neurolinguistic
Programming Practitioners (NLP) identify as a great deal
of ‘deletions’ – they will delete ANYTHING
in your favor and anything in favor of the paranormal -
and will focus only on the weaknesses of the weak mediums.
ALWAYS come across with the knowledge and attitude that
there is IRREBUTABLE, irrefutable evidence for psi/afterlife
‘Cognitive dissonance’ is a term used by psychologists
to describe the discomfort that arises when people are confronted
with information inconsistent with their beliefs. When a
materialist is confronted with highly persuasive evidence
for the psi/afterlife the materialist will deny it immediately
because the evidence will elicit anxiety, increase his blood
pressure, sweat etc. Denial will follow. The materialists
will become angry, hostile and even aggressive He will try
to reduce anxiety by denying the information.
Because it gives them anxiety they don’t study the
best evidence. They try to speak in generalities and imply
that because it may be remotely possible to produce results
fraudulently then AUTOMATICALLY all results can be assumed
to be the result of fraud.
Remember the rule: he who asserts must prove. We proved
psi/afterlife exists. For example, Professor Gary Schwartz
brilliantly showed this. (See also scientists in psi: http://www.victorzammit.com/book/chapter02.html
Others like myself as an expert in evidence have shown that
there is empirical evidence – I outlined some 20 different
areas of empirical evidence for the existence of the afterlife
which up until the present have NOT been rebutted. It’s
been on the Net for SEVEN years and NO SCIENTIST, NO EMPIRICIST
has negated the said evidence!
POINTS TO LEARN THOROUGHLY
we are finding that no amount of science will convince any
skeptic who does not want to be convinced about the afterlife.”
so-called skeptics are nothing but hard core materialists
– those who staunchly and completely deny psi and
the afterlife (eg Paul Kurtz, Ray Hyman, James Randi, Richard
Wiseman). They unfairly and dishonestly hijacked the word
‘skeptic’ to make themselves more acceptable.
litany of ‘you can’t prove the negative’
is absolute rubbish. We positively stated WHAT the evidence
is – the onus now is on these materialists to show
why the evidence cannot be accepted.”
get one thing clear. The close minded skeptics, the hard
core materialists are in the extreme minority - less than
5%. Andrew Greely, a sociologist, states that surveys have
repeatedly shown that the really hard core materialists
or closed minded skeptics those who do not believe in the
afterlife constitute only some 5% of the American public.”
is a fundamentalist religion with many priests but with
no congregation.’ Richard Milton said that.
CSICOP: (Committee for Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal).
“First, this CSICOP is NOT scientific. The study of
its origin shows that those genuine scientists resigned
from it because they saw CSICOP NOT as ‘scientific’
but as negative active propaganda against the paranormal.”
CSICOP’s president Paul Kurtz, was NOT a scientist
but a philosopher. As a professor he uttered a most unscientific
statement that he ‘believes that the paranormal does
not and cannot exist.’
James Randi: “He says he used to be a magician, someone
who is also trained in cheating and deception. He’s
not a scientist, he’s not an empiricist, he’s
not formally trained in experimenting. He’s NEVER
done any repeatable experiments. He never submitted any
study for peer review. He’s a hard core deeply entrenched
closed minded materialist. He’s an expert at ‘verbal
sleight of hand’ – and has fooled many people.
Randi’s alleged $1m offer: utter rubbish! A ‘verbal
sleight of hand’ to fool, hoodwink, mislead and deceive
the American and other people. Many applied but no gifted
medium was EVER allowed to even attempt the challenge. Randi
is on record for saying, “I always have a way out
(of paying).” While on this subject, Randi himself
FAILED to win $1million from Victor Zammit – he FAILED
to show why Victor’s objective afterlife evidence
cannot be accepted.
Richard Wiseman: “…First, technically he is
NOT a pedigree scientist. He’s NOT a hands on clinical
psychologist. He’s an academic lecturer. He’s
a closed minded skeptic, a materialist and he has NEVER
found anything in favor of psi. As such he should NEVER
investigate gifted psychics because he is on record as stating
that they cannot be genuine – he violates the legal
adage ‘no one should be a judge in his own cause!’
Marilyn Schlitz showed that Wiseman’s results cannot
be trusted because of the ‘experimenter effect’.
He inevitably influences results to be negative, he does
not have the technical ‘unprejudiced competence’
to conduct an experiment fairly.
lost international credibility as an empiricist in the Natasha
Demkina case – according to lawyer Victor Zammit on
his website, Wiseman lied, cheated and made misrepresentations
in the Natasha Demkina experiment -something which will
stay will him till he dies – and afterwards says Victor.
aware that materialists in any debate will pick on weak
psychics to show that psychic phenomena are not valid. You
must learn the classic psychic events which shattered the
world – and which have NOT been rebutted. (*you could
memorize some five classic cases. To help you collect some
of these go to BOOK http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html
science has NEVER shown that the afterlife does not or cannot
exist. BUT the 'new scientists' show the opposite: that
quantum physics is showing that other realities (afterlife,
psi) are not only possible but probable! Be aware that debunkers
in the media, (closed minded skeptics and the materialists)
try to bluff you and bluff the journalists and give the
impression that science is on their side in this debate.
NOT TRUE! These debunkers do NOT have science to support
their claim that 'the paranormal or the afterlife do not
exist.' Technically, these debunkers become 'believers'
- they have a 'subjective belief' - that there is no afterlife/psi.
That is why they hide behind "you can't prove the negative"
- implying they do not have to do anything and shift the
onus on to the psi empiricists and psychics to prove that
psi/afterlife exist. That has been done. Push the issue
that debunkers in this psi debate are really 'believers.'
This means their belief is 'subjective' and anything subjective
belief is itself subject to error to complete invalidation.
Do NOT forget that science has NEVER shown the afterlife
does not or that it cannot exist.
queries? For more information contact Victor Zammit email@example.com
This is a free service extended to psychics and psi
empiricists who have to deal with closed minded skeptics/materialists.
If you have anything to contribute please feel free to contact
Since the eighties the active ‘closed minded skeptics’,
the ‘debunkers’ and the ‘materialists’
including the institutionalized materialistic CSICOP have
followed a most heinous strategy. If at anytime anywhere
a psychic or an honest psi empiricist produces most convincing
evidence for psi or the afterlife the debunkers will attempt
public ridicule, scorn and derision – to rubbish anything
not consistent with materialism and to call the successful
tactic applied by these negatives is to try to show how
the medium, the psychic could have attempted to cheat by
using fraudulent methods. Then afterwards, they will say,
“see we showed you how they cheated” and then
dishonestly claim “he was proved to be a fraud/quack”.
The insidious, malevolent motivation is that by repeating
the attacks on the credibility of gifted mediums, psychics
and psi empiricists and scientists some of the mud will
materialists will try to influence the media by claiming
to be representative of “official science”,
conniving by negative manipulation of information that ‘science
does not agree with the psychic’s positively produced
results.’ Uninformed editors may swallow the rubbish
UNLESS the editor has the capacity to perceive the issue
with true balanced equanimity and a detailed knowledge of
Richard Wiseman indulged in most unfair behavior to willfully
mislead, deceive, to negatively manipulate and misrepresent
the results of the gifted psychic Natasha Demkina; he then
had the audacity to write and impute in the Guardian that
Natasha as a psychic was a cheat. But we know that this
matter has been reviewed by objective experts who have come
to the conclusion that Wiseman is a materialist stooge who
lost his credibility for objective psi experimentation.
Return to Articles