VICTOR J ZAMMIT
A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife
.
  .

Speakers' Corner - Victor Zammit, orator:

See also 32 historical pictures of Speakers' Corner - London and Sydney ... see more ...



For those around the world who never attended Speakers' Corner at London's Hyde Park in London or at the Speakers' Corner at the Sydney Domain, a tremendous shock will be experienced. Speakers' Corner is symbolic for the democratic process: freedom of speech and assembly. But to many people it is a place for entertainment. Those tourists who used to visit Speakers' Corner were absolutely stunned at the British tradition of freedom of speech.

Here below is more oratory from Victor, who had his own style, his own way of enlightening his weekly big crowds.

Victor: Here we are again … a warm wonderful welcome to you all … I see people coming from everywhere … they see Victor here … now …and yes, we are going to have another big crowd to-day.

So welcome everyone … welcome those who live here, welcome those who come from overseas … and welcome all Christians, Followers of Krishna, Hindus, Moslems, Jews, atheists … agnostics … and others.

This is the place. Now is the time. We have lovely blue skies, warm sunshine here all around huge beautiful trees … so relax with Victor … this lovely afternoon …

Ah now we do have a good crowd … so soon! … Questions … any questions …don’t be shy. Victor will answer all questions about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness …

Interjector: Here Victor this guy wearing a dog-collar … a Catholic priest … his name is Peter …

Victor (to the priest): could you wait until I take this question first … YES YOU!!!

Peter: I have a question for you …

Victor: What’s your name?

Charlie: My name is Charlie …

Victor: Aren’t you one of those atheist speakers we see around Speakers' Corner?…

Charlie: Yes, yes I am … I have a question. You said last week that there is an afterlife … I don’t agree with that … nobody has ever returned to tell us there’s an afterlife …

Victor: Obviously you have not done any research about the afterlife. You are articulating your negative, anti-afterlife prejudices. But let me tell you something that will shock you and will shock the whole world …SCIENCE now has irreversibly established that those who crossed over have in fact communicated and are communicating with those who are still on this physical planet earth …

Charlie: What science are you talking about?

Victor: I have studied the afterlife from an empirical… that is from an objective, scientific perspective …

Charlie: HOLD ON BEFORE YOU SAY ANYTHING … what qualifications have you to say that you are an empiricist? … That’s something I ask every speaker …

Victor: Fair enough question! I have four university degrees – three degrees from highly accredited universities – the University of New South Wales in Sydney Australia. I have higher degree from an American university which is unconventional but with extremely high standards where I had to debate a State Attorney General on the constitutional law of the Bill of Rights as part of my higher degree … see my website ABOUT VICTOR www.victorzammit.com – it’s all there …

I also have a University Diploma in Education – from another accredited university – the University of Technology, in Sydney.

I have an Arts degree with a major in Psychology where I had also had to do three years full time at professional level Scientific Method adjunct to the subject of Psychology … That gave me three years of doing experiments empirically … understanding what is objective, subjective and anecdotal evidence in science.

That gave me training in what variables to control in experiments – extraneous, dependent and independent variables. One of the greatest lessons I learnt from my professor was: "tell me what extraneous variables you controlled and I will tell you how good your experiment is".

I also have a Diploma in Hypnotism from the accredited New South Wales School of Hypnotic Sciences - as an adjunct to my University degree in Psychology degree.

So I do have AUTHORITY to tell you with absolute certainty that the evidence for the afterlife is objective, is empirical, is repeatable, is scientific.

Now, what qualifications do YOU have?

Charlie: I reached third level in high shool .... so, let me deal with this guy Charlie ...

Interjector: Why do you call it scientific …?

Victor: Where you have a formula repeated over time and space, keeping variables constant, and you get the same results, then you have science – because you can predict with accuracy. And when you can predict with accuracy, you are testing the validity of a phenomenon you are measuring – and inevitably that is science …

Charlie: Which scientists are claiming there is an afterlife …

Victor: Correction – you should be asking which scientists USED THEIR PROFESSIONALISM AND EXPERITISE IN SCIENCE and have come to the irrevocable conclusion that there is an afterlife.

Interjectors: Yes, yes, yes … we want to know how science was used to show there is an afterlife …

Victor: OK … we’re getting somewhere now. Let’s approach this systematically … here let me get my book out … there is Sir William Crookes, perhaps the greatest scientist in his time. He was a skeptic. But he investigated and the evidence was overwhelming … and he accepted the existence of the afterlife.

There is Sir Oliver Lodge, one of the world’s greatest scientists – he too investigated and he too accepted the afterlife …

There is Sir William Barrett … and other great world personalities …

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, one of the greatest British authors – he investigated and he accepted the afterlife … Emmanuel Swedenborg – the greatest European scientist of his time – earlier than Sir William Crookes …

There’s that famous American Professor Hyslop who was a skeptic but on investigating the afterlife, like other scientists he accepted the afterlife …

There’s that unorthodox American investigator George Meek …

One of the pioneers of television John Logie Baird accepted the afterlife through his investigations … From Canada there’s that brilliant medical scientist Dr Glen Hamilton … and recently we get those professors who talk about quantum physics and the afterlife …

From England - not far from here in Bath on the West coast … someone I correspond with Ron Pearson – see his brilliant afterlife physics …

Professor Archie Roy- another brilliant Professor from Scotland who used his expertise in science and came to his irretrievable conclusion that yes, he said, there is an afterlife … of course …

Then there are the Quantum Physics scientists who investigated and accepted the paranormal ...

I must not forget that brilliant physicist who won a Nobel Prize for his physics who confirms – using strictly scientific method - that the paranormal is real – Professor Brian Josephson.

There’s Professor Fred Alan Wolf … and from Germany there’s Professor Ernst Senkowski … and back to the United States we get those other giants of the empirical paranormal Professor Harold Puthoff, Professor Russell Targ, Professor Amit Goswami …

And that Dr Dean Radin whose book on the paranormal was translated into fourteen languages … there are so many more … go to my book on the internet and you can access all these names and my scientific evidence for the afterlife completely free of charge…

Charlie: Jesus!!!! That’s impressive … I’ve never come across these names before!

Victor: NO NO NO … my name is not Jesus … it’s Victor! (crowd response)

You haven't heard about it about it because you have NOT researched the afterlife systematically …

Let me tell you something else … I KNOW that my evidence for the afterlife is ABSOLUTELY substantive, irrefutable and irrebuttable. Why? Because the evidence I presented has objectivity and repeatability.

This means, as every scientist knows - no one on earth would be able to rebut objectivity and repeatability. The afterlife evidence is with us to stay whether we like it or not!

Charlie: I don’t agree with that Victor … for every argument you put across there will always be someone with an opposite view…

Victor: NOT THIS TIME Charlie … there will always be arguments and counter-arguments where the evidence is subjective, where there are beliefs and blind faith.

But when the evidence is absolutely empirical, objective and repeatable, there can never be counter arguments. Let me explain more on this one …

I challenged skeptics – and this is something you can see for yourself on my website – remember it is www.victorzammit.com that if they could show that my evidence for the afterlife cannot be valid, I will hand over ONE MILLION DOLLARS cash!

Charlie: Are you REAL about that? You mean nobody has beaten that challenge …?

Victor: I went public on this one some years ago … NO genius scientist, NO genius physicist, NO biologist, NO psychologist … and NO genius skeptical debunker has been able to beat my challenge … NO ONE has been able to show that my objective, repeatable objective evidence for the afterlife is not valid!

And in professional debate any submitted evidence which has not been rebutted will remain valid – translated this means THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE and no skeptic, no anti-afterlife atheist, no secular scientist and no gross materialist can do anything about this: THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE!

Why Charlie … you’re as quiet as a mouse … (crowd response)

Perhaps YOU would like to take me on … what’re your qualifications this Charlie asked me … wake up you anti-afterlife prophets of doom … you are living in the past … you have not done your homework.

Charlie: Are you crusading Victor?

Victor: ABSOLUTELY NOT! …I do not crusade, I do not evangelize, I do not preach religion … but I do have a mission to educate uninformed people like you who are atheistically anti-afterlife who have not investigated.

Wake up and understand that no skeptical debunker, no scientist, no philosopher no existentialist writer has ever explained anywhere, anytime that there is no afterlife or that there could be no afterlife ….

Peter the priest: But there Victor, I must say, no one can prove the negative …

Victor: I have expressly stated some twenty two areas of objective afterlife evidence. In professional debate if the evidence is not rebutted, the evidence will remain valid. But as I said before, if the evidence is repeatable and objective, it can NEVER be rebutted. And the evidence will remain VALID!

When you come to Victor you'd better have done your homework … many others have tried and many others have miserably failed …

I tell you … I tell this crowd here and now … the afterlife has HUGE consequences and we here in the West are discouraged to talk about it …

Questioner: Why’s that Victor?

Victor: Why is that? Simply because materialism has become so voracious. Materialism will not allow people to become spiritual. When you become spiritual you will be LESS of a consumer because you will be careful what to buy, what to eat, where to go.

Materialism is about spending big and spending now. And if you don’t have the money, the materialists say GO BORROW THE MONEY! But keep on spending, spending … as much as you can … get a bigger house, get a bigger car, get a bigger swimming pool …

Heckler: And what’s wrong with that?

Victor: That’s short term thinking and short term planning. You’re on this planet earth for a relatively short time – just a few decades … then you will die … you will cross over to an afterlife where time is by earth’s standard too long … hundreds, thousands, millions and much, much more

Heckler: But what’s wrong with having the best things in life …

Victor: Absolutely nothing wrong if you can afford it … but I am referring to those who go on borrowing to try to impress … get what you want but you must NEVER forget you are only here for a short time and what you DO – not what you believe in – will be critical as to what will happen to you when you die …

Victor (assertively): PUT YOUR HANDS UP ALL THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE AFTERLIFE …

Out of a crowd of a couple of thousand (laughter) … only FIVE don’t believe in the afterlife …

Interjector: No Victor … only five have the courage to put their hands up …

Victor: I want you to tell me what are your objections to the existence of the afterlife

YES YOU …

Questioner: Religion has been telling us about the afterlife for thousands of years … no one really takes them seriously ..

Victor: First, I AM NOT speaking on behalf of ANY the Churches … make the difference between science and theology.

I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THEOLOGY!

I am into science because science and empiricism are OBJECTIVE – and religious beliefs and theology are SUBJECTIVE!

And you don’t have to be a graduate to understand this …

I use EMPIRICISM because it is OBJECTIVE and all universities from around the world accept that whenever there is an inconsistency between OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE evidence, OBJECTIVE evidence will prevail and will ALWAYS prevail …

Not only that … subjectivity, that is all religious and other BELIEFS because they are SUBJECTIVE are themselves subject to complete INVALIDATION!

Interjector: You have an example of this …

Victor: Alright … I tell you something that the whole world now accepts to be true … remember Galileo? That was a classic case where there was theology clashing with science. Galileo told the Pope that the earth is NOT in the center of the universe – as theologians interpreted the Bible. Galileo invited the Pope and his theologians to have a look through the telescope to prove to the Church what science was stating.

What happened? The Pope refused to look through the telescope! He said that was the work of the devil! It took the Church over THREE HUNDRED years to accept that science negated the subjectivity of theology.

To the crowd: DID YOU ALL UNDERSTAND THE GALILEO EXAMPLE?

Crowd, loudly: YES VICTOR! Yes …

Charlie: Yes Victor that’s impressive … I still can’t believe that no skeptical professor took you on …

Victor: Have a look at my website … it’s ALL THERE! I show what technically constitute afterlife evidence … I have been investigating the afterlife for some fifteen years now … and I put the afterlife evidence on my website …

Charlie: Which evidence is this?

Victor: Here it is in this book as well … I put this book on the internet …at no cost to anyone to read the afterlife evidence - see www.victorzammit.com … here for example in Chapter one I explain about evidence.

In Chapter two I have respected scientists who investigated. In Chapter three, as you can see here … I have materialization experiences … Chapter four Voices on Tape … Chapter five instrumental trans-communication … chapter six near death experiences … chapter seven out of body experiences …and here it goes all the way down to remote viewing, apparitions, deathbed visions, quantum mechanics and the afterlife …and many other chapters you can find on my website …

Charlie: I have to admit Victor … I’ve never come across this material before. I will be reading it and studying it and I’ll email you with any queries …

Victor: Well done Charlie …at least you are prepared to investigate something that you can never avoid … crossing over to the otherside when you die is something very, very serious. So many people ignore it. So many people do themelves a great deal of injustice; in their last days so many people would have given anything to have read a book on the afterlife and what’s going to happen when you die …

Hey there Charlie … where is he … there you are … would you not agree that communicating with the otherside is THE GREATEST DISCOVERY IN HUMAN HISTORY ….

victorzammit@optushome.com.au

<< Return to Index

.