A few days ago,
underneath the Franco-Swiss border, a first beam of Protons
started their way around the world's most powerful Hadron
Collider designed for supplying an experimental proof
for the prevailing Standard Theory of matter, while hunting
for the still elusive, cosmologically significant "Higgs
boson", and the "quark-gluon plasma". Both
these are believed by some theorists to have been involved
at the origins of our Universe, one billionth of a second
after the hypothetical Big Bang.
If it operates
successfully, the current LHC experiment is expected to
yield particle collisions supplying an unprecedented energy
level of 14TeV, thus conveying to the proton beams a Lorenz
factor of 7500, which corresponds to their reaching for
all practical purposes the "light-speed limit",
beyond which incremental increases in the energy supply
is expected to result in increasing mass values, according
to relativity theory.
Thousands of
scientists all over the world nourish high expectancies
from the ongoing experiment, defying safety concerns for
our planet and possibly for the whole cosmos. Their blind
faith in the correctness of their own mathematical constructs
-strongly believed to reflect the way nature has been created
and the paths it subsequently followed - is perplexing.
Though, as yet,
the CERN project's outcome is a big question mark, its importance
for mankind lies far beyond the narrow set of its openly
assessed scopes. Its designers have to reluctantly
admit that the "ATLAS" experiment (one of the
project's main targets) may compel the scientific community
to consider alternate physical paradigms implying extra
dimensions or new conceptual vectors, in their
ceaseless struggle to crack some of the still hidden codes
of our world and of ourselves.
Perhaps the "Higgs
boson" may be detected and thus Prof. Hawking may lose
his $100 bet. Nevertheless, the actual value of the
results, as related to the great unfolding drama of the
cosmos, may turn out to have been bitterly overestimated,
after all the experiments are completed.
The CERN scientists
play God in a game of self-made rules... They claim the
ability to replicate the cosmogenic event, even at this
early stage of man's most recent experimental attempt to
understand reality. They are trying to achieve a re-implementing
of the scenes which are believed to have followed immediately
after the instant of the manifestation of the Universe.
Of course, important insights may be achieved by these experiments
regarding the "HOW" the material Universe may
have started, its possible structure, and how it may work.
On the other hand, the results may also counteract existing
theories.
The crucial question
is what is the actual origination of these supposed events?
No revelation in this regard is expected from the LHC. It
will keep a total silence in this respect. This answer will
remain beyond its experimental outreach, at the other side
of the highly hypothetical Big Bang. Investigation of this
question requires a fundamental change of mind, some higher
vantage point, from where alternative physics may evolve.
This
physics should account not only for mass and energy and
all the currently familiar physical forces, but this physics
should be able to explain - instead of reject as non-conforming
oddities - Information-driven events.
This is a physics
where the light speed ceases to be a Universal constant
(as recently proved at the Harvard University!), and still
less an upper limit of velocity. A physics where Information
is stored and transferred by SubQuantum aether fluxes, moving
with any velocity between zero and infinity, where probabilistic
Quantum nonsense becomes an informationally determined scenario,
surpassing Space and Time constraints. This is a physics
of sentience, of meaning, of purpose. A physics where teleological
attractors act to complete causality chains. This implies
sentience.
Yes,
we are living in a sentient, purposeful Universe.
Classical, relativistic and Quantum tenets still obviously
apply, each in its own specific range of application, all
under the covering umbrella of this new physics. At Geneva,
we are now approaching a very advanced stage of exploring
the limits of the present commonly accepted theories. A
more detailed structure of matter and of energy will hopefully
be revealed. But regardless of the results, this is in no
way the end of the story. It is the beginning of our quest
for the meanings that such results may have to convey to
us about the world.
The next
step of mankind will have to address Information as the
pro-active and originating component of space-time-like
manifestations of matter/energy, at the deepest level of
the infinitesimals, a region never addressed before.
The puzzle of
the self-reflecting loop of Consciousness has to be solved.
The understanding process has to transcend its external
object, returning upon itself.
The prevailing
mechanistic view of the world has to be replaced by a new
paradigm of sentient reality. The term "sentience"
is now presented in an all-encompassing context. Now, Creation
is an intelligent never-ending interplay, running between
endless implication levels of Information Fields. This requires
a new Physics, a new Cosmology, a new understanding, gradually
replacing the older ones.
Endless ruminations
in Philosophy and Consciousness Studies exist, spinning
around epiphenomenal tenets imposed by hopeless mainstream
canonical dogmas. These will eventually be forced to admit
their conceptual sterility, their misleading potential,
and their absolute disconnectedness from a wide array of
observables, and empirically provable facts, existing in
our everyday experience.
Reality will
never conform to scholastic biases. Science has
to adapt itself to experiencable reality, however disturbing
this adaptation process would be for some opinion leaders
of the ruling academic establishment. Misinterpretations
and denial of factual evidence for the sake of self-preserving
credibility have to end.
At the "Quantum
Mind" Conference in Salzburg, and at the "T.S.C.
Conference" in Budapest - both held in 2007, a new
SubQuantum approach to sentience has been brought to public
attention by the author of these lines, together with the
eminent American Quantum Physicist R.N.Boyd, PhD, whose
high scientific credentials are well documented in the scientific
literature.
The lecture's
purpose: Lifting the centuries-old taboo surrounding the
Self's ontological autonomy from its neural correlates.
Our challenging the prevailing world-view of consciousness
is roughly coincides with the onset of the CERN LHC experiments.
Are possibly both programmed by the Cosmic Harmony as mutually
supporting breakthroughs? Mere coincident timing, or meaningful
coincidence?
We ask for your
permission to share with you some basics of our insights
at this relatively early stage of our work. We trustfully
rely upon the reader's ability to set up their own correlations,
by their ability to discern reliable information from out
of the dense bulk of misleading information which presently
exists in the world, this present condition being due to
previous systematic disinformation processes regarding the
various sciences, and due to previously existing dogmas
and assumptions in the sciences.
We hope to succeed
making our concepts accessible not only for the academic
community, but also for the wide disclosure pool of Dr.
Zammit's open-minded readers.
As we
will see along the following Issues, the new world-view
hereby introduced, is safely and deeply rooted in the most
recent experimental results of leading scholars all around
the world. It is strongly supporting the case that
Dr. Zammit's tireless and admirable efforts are advocating.
Yes, we are able
to emphatically claim that human consciousness is the pro-active
principle, while the brain is just its epiphenomenal transient
integration system into a Space-Time coordinated component
of Bohm's implicating orders of reality - Bohm's implicate
order being miserably ignored in most of the prevalent attempts
to model the All.
The ability of
the personality to preserve its integral cognitive range
in its dissociated state from the brain will be not only
emphatically stated, but proved as being a sine-qua-non
requirement of the novel SubQuantum approach.
Moreover, it
might well turn out that public concerns related to the
CERN experiment's safety topics are unfounded pure fantasies,
possibly not less so than the much feared Black Holes or
the Big Bang theory may be.
Modern Science,
Religion and Mysticism might well prove to be complementary
and incomplete precursors of a more accurate interpretation
of the Universe we are living in, an interpretation which
eventually will derive from the proper blending of these
mutually supporting components.
However,
the present scientific habit of canonical intellectual obstructions
of common sense, based on previous dogmas, must cease, before
the actual facts can be realized, by those of the community
interested in such facts.
Grateful thanks
to Dr. Zammit for his kind agreement to host our contribution
to his blessed pioneering work along this line of challenging
the many presently existing, yet obsolete, scleromorphic
dogmas, which are quickly collapsing by now under the crushing
weight of an increasingly growing database of well documented
spontaneous and experimental evidence, as revealed in part
by his weekly web-reports.
19th September 2009
|