A lawyer rebuts the giants of materialist science and negative empiricists - psychologists and other skeptics:

A SEPARATE - $500.000 OFFER TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! Half a million dollars is being offered by my sponsors to anyone to duplicate our materializations results and to show why the evidence cannot be admissible evidence in relation to proving the afterlife - not only to the debunkers and other materialists, but the offer is open to the most advanced scientists and anybody else in the world to-day including those anti-materializations 'spiritualits'. But if the applicant fails, a legal requirement is that the applicant will have to hand over half a million dollars to the Circle of the Silver Cord. After eighteen long months, no materialist genius, no scientist, no physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no debunker has been able to rebut the most important afterlife evidence in human history. Got the motivation? Got the courage? Got the stomach for it? I'M WAITING FOR YOU!!!

WHY HAS NO ONE BEATEN YOUR MATERIALIZASTION $500,000 OFFER VICTOR? This is because the Circle of the Silver Cord (COSC) has the most professional team in the history of materializations. The COSC has professionally qualified and highly experienced experts in fraud detection - (ex-intelligence and police officers), has a professionally qualified psychologist with expertise in Scientific Method and there is expertise in the legal admissibility of evidence. To my knowledge there has never been at any time in history a non-religious clinical materialization Circle which has so many professionals with relevant professional expertise and extensive relevant experience - more than fifteen months of regular weekly materializations. You understand why no materialist closed minded skeptic or anybody else will not take me on?

*************************

Victor Zammit rebuts Zwinge Randi

J (Zwinge) Randi Attacks Lawyer Victor Zammit – Victor’s Rebuttal : Someone sent me Victor an email that James Zwinge Randi, (hereinafter JZR) had some fifteen articles attacking me. Why is JZR wrong and most unfair and unjust in his attempt to maliciously attack me? Why is he so hugely frustrated, why is he fuming with anger, why is he so venomously aggressive against me and psi experts and gifted mediums? Why does he bother with having the greatest hoax in paranormal history?

1. Failure to beat my challenge. More than seven years ago JZR implied he was going to take me on regarding the ONE MILLION DOLLARS for anyone to show that my objective empirical evidence has no validity. That was over seven years ago, I AM STILL WAITING!! And anything which has not been rebutted will stay valid until it is rebutted. If empirical afterlife evidence cannot be rebutted it will stay valid – permanently. His refusal to even try on his claimed basis that, “You can’t prove the negative” is invalid, illegitimate, unacceptable and worthless – not consistent with the professional rules of debate see below.

2. JZR is allegedly a stage magician – JZR is NOT a scientist, he is not an empiricist, he is not a scholar or an intellectual or a researcher. He has NO formalized learning regarding experimentation. He never had any of his writings referred to by academic scientists or scholars. In fact his conduct shows him to be a conman, a mind-manipulator and someone who himself admits to being highly skilled in deception, trickery and conning. Read full report ....

*****************************

QUESTION OF THE WEEK: (received yesterday) why is it that a mentally queer guy debunker attacked you?

Victor: They attack me through sheer extreme frustration that they have been unable to rebut my empirically elicited objective evidence for the existence of the afterlife. After EIGHT long years – no debunking closed minded skeptic, no scientist, no negative empiricist has been able to show that my expressly stated evidence is invalid. The objective afterlife evidence and the positive results of the gifted mediums are making these debunkers look absolutely stupid and utterly ridiculous! Information came to me that one of the materialist/debunkers – someone I’m informed is called ‘Skunknic’ (?) who blasphemed, and used gutter level language is acting as if he's actually ‘mentally sick.’ – I will not engage with mentally sick people – he needs psychiatric treatment urgently. I’ll rattle his cage if I want to hear from him!

The 'EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.' The negatively minded skeptical experimenter will obtain negative results in psychic experiments notwithstanding other empiricists considered to be 'neutral' obtain positive results doing the same experiments. This is most relevant for those who genuinely want to test gifted psychics. See a most interesting example of the EXPERIMENTER EFFECT > Dr. Marilyn Schlitz neutral experimenter obtained positive results and Dr Richard Wiseman, who has a historical track record of finding against psychics - doing the same experiment as Dr Schlitz consistently obtained negative results - see the the University of Freiburg Studies and Mick O’Neil’s analysis of Wiseman’s experimental style - last time was seen on: http://www.forteantimes.com/artic/espcrit/espcrit.html

Scientific skepticism

" There is no more honourable word in the scientific lexicon that that of 'skeptic' -- one who sincerely seeks after truth and who has the courage to rebut scientific myths and false beliefs with empirical data and sound logic."So begins Richard Milton's excellent article On Skepticism..

Victor Zammit: A Lawyer Rebuts Dr G.M. Woerlee, NDE DebunkerL Anti-afterlife debunker G.M. Woerlee from Holland attempts to debunk Near Death Experiences by way of his book, by what he writes on his website and by the lectures he has given to the skeptics. Initially: what do his works reveal? Read more …

THE UNBELIEVER': "There will never be enough evidence for those who don't want to accept the evidence." How true! I came across someone who is either too uninformed or blatantly against materializations or blatantly mischievous - and someone who never ever participated in David Thompson's materializations - and who states that no spirit ever materialized - became solid - in David materialization. But all those who attended David's materialization will tell you that many times William, David's guide, materializes walks around the seance room even puts his hand on some people. He put his solid hand on my shoulder when I first attended David's materializations meeting. William is a very tall man with very heavy footsteps - probably wearing size 14 shoes. OK, I tell this mischievous unbeliever, would he be prepared to attend one session, opens his legs wide, stands in the front row, with his hands hehind, and allow William to give this unbeliever a kick between his legs as if William was going to kick a football to score a goal from some fifty meters away. This is a matter of telling this mischievous guy to put up or shut up!

ON EVIDENCE; ‘PROVING THE NEGATIVE’: re - this week’s new video on youtube – SKEPTICS DEMOLISHED – objection number 3. That flamboyant guy from Florida Randi for years stated that, “no one can prove Victor Zammit’s afterlife evidence because ‘no one can prove the negative.’!! That is irrelevant in professional debate. Why? Because this closed minded skeptic is saying that he ‘cannot prove that the afterlife does not exist.’ That statement is immediately made INVALID when I presented some 23 areas of afterlife EVIDENCE for the existence of the afterlife. This skeptic does NOT have to prove anything – all he has to do is to rebut MY evidence- WHERE, WHEN, HOW and WHY the evidence I presented is not right. Further, there is not only my evidence I presented, there are at least a thousand investigators around the world who produced their own afterlife evidence. Also there have been some of the most intelligent scientists and professionals who walked on this planet earth early last century (Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Barrett, Sir William Crookes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle et al) who AFTER they empirically investigated the afterlife, they conceded the afterlife evidence is absolutely irrefutable. So that the statement that no one can prove the afterlife does not exist (no one can prove the negative) is absolutely irrelevant, immaterial, inadmissible and invalid. Information reached me that closed minded guy from Florida does NO LONGER state ‘you can’t prove the negative’ in relation to the existence of the afterlife. Only some skeptics in Europe – in Italy, a few in Austria and a couple in Denmark have not woken up to professional debate to drop the absolute nonsense ‘you can’t prove the negative.’

-- Victor Zammit, amended February 2008

SEE MILLION DOLLAR CHALLENGE ON
UTUBE: http://snipurl.com/1ugve

THE closed minded skeptic clock now:

The Miami materialist J Zwinge R Clock began in April 2001!! Since then this materialist, closed minded skeptic has refused to rebut my objective evidence for the afterlife. My evidence is EXPRESSLY STATED - 23 areas of evidence for the existence of the afterlife.

CHALLENGE:
to Zwinge Randi: do what Victor Zammit did: formally make out a proper legal written statement on oath (subject to up to seven years in prison if caught lying): that you do in fact have the one million dollars cash you claim you have regarding your alleged $1m challenge. A proviso should be that any applicant will have the right to cite this very important document. Have the courage? Have the dough? 12/12/07

QUESTION: In these extremely difficult financial times, do you still guarantee the one million dollars challenge?

Victor: Absolutely! I have legal documents– unlike that closed minded skeptic from Florida who says he has a million dollars challenge but does not guarantee the funding – my legal document says that I could go to prison for up to five years if I do not have the funding. That is a sworn statement which is subject to statutory law. But the Florida skeptic chose NOT to match my condition. He said he was going to but then changed his mind. Why not? Because to many people, that shows he does not have one million dollars for any challenge - but conclude he has the greatest million dollar hoax in paranormal history!

COLOSSAL SKEPTICS’ FAILURES:
(1) THE ALPHA PROJECT – LIES, CHEATING AND MISCHIEF: the most
shameful, disgusting skeptical fraud in
history: some skeptics think this project - when a closed minded skeptic concocted to infiltrate two dummy skeptics into a psychic research project – was a great success. Absolute nonsense! These two infiltrators lied, cheated, pretended to be psychics when they were closed minded skeptics to fool, to mislead, to willfully misdirect the psychic experiment. You call that successful? – by lying and cheating and negatively manipulating the circumstances to prevent the truth from being discovered? It was a disgusting fraud - manipulated to fundamentally mislead the professional experimenters who were conducted a legitimate experiment about psychic phenomena. The Alpha Project will go down in history as the most shameful and most disgusting concocted fraud in history organized by the closed minded J Randi.

SKEPTICS’ HOAXES (2) The ‘Carlos’ affair: in 1988 closed minded skeptic J Randi planned a hoax to deceive the Australian people. (picture: the longer the nose the bigger the lies) He was able to get some guy Jose Alverez to claim that
he was channeling some spirit called ‘Carlos.’ What was not anticipated by the closed minded skeptic is that Australians generally are perhaps ten times more skeptical than any other race on earth. The journalists are perhaps a hundred times more skeptical than anybody else. Now this guy Randi thought he could deceive, fool and make idiots out of these highly skeptical Australians. What happened? After the show at the Opera House, this cheat Alvarez what crossed examined by tough Australian journalists – who literally tore him apart and uncovered his fraud. So much so, that this Alvarez could not withstand the tough questioning and RAN AWAY from the interview!! But the end result was a huge failure for the closed minded skeptics, for Randi, for Alvarez and for the cheats and conmen of this world. Another hoax, perpetrated by a closed minded skeptic was uncovered to by the toughest journalists in Australia.

QUESTION: Hey Victor, why don’t you deface the website of that king of the skeptics guy from Florida who keeps on attacking you?

Victor: one would have to be a complete imbecile to deface any website. I am well above that. I show where, when, how and why this king of the skeptics from Florida is wrong. When I came on the scene some 21 years ago, he wanted to know where is the afterlife evidence? Within an amazing short time I put my empirical evidence for public consumption then on the internet. Since that time no closed minded skeptic, no genius magician or genius reductionist-scientist, no materialist in that time has been able to show where, when, how and why the evidence I presented was not right. IN fact a number of scientists state that my afterlife evidence is solid and objective and repeatable – which means it can NEVER be rebutted. Defacing his website would mean I failed in my argument. The fact that no genius scientist or genius skeptic beat my challenge shows I am on the winning side. Defacing websites is only for losers and defeatists.

COMMENTARY: TIME FOR THIS PSI-IGNORANT HARVARD PROFESSOR TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! It is time to take on this uninformed psi-ignorant Harvard Prof Pinker in a serious way. I find it shocking that TIME magazine allowed descriptive – unsubstantiated writings in the endeavor to invalidate the existing irrefutable evidence for psi and the afterlife.

I am more than happy to challenge this professionally uninformed Professor: I will donate half a million dollars to his department if he can show that what we are doing – communicating with afterlife entities in materialization experiments- is not coming from the afterlife dimension – from existing minds outside the physical brain.

Also, he has to rebut the empirical psi evidence validating communicating with inter-dimensional entities.

If he fails, he has to hand over to the Circle of the Silver Cord (seven open-minded skeptical investigators) half a million dollars for their empirical research. It is a matter of telling this reductionist professor who is inexorably lowering the standards of psychology at Harvard to put up or shut up.

Notwithstanding there may be laws regarding ‘betting’ in some countries, we hereinabove are talking about ‘donations.’

I am not at this stage calling this Professor Pinker an intellectual and a morally coward. We’ll see if he has the fortitude to respond!

(The above was sent to the Prof et al 25th January 07).

AN AFTERTHOUGHT: So this Harvard Professor, in a cowardly way writes to TIME magazine to knowingly denigrate, disparage and malign the brilliant paranormal work of those scientists – such as Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Barrett, Sir William Crookes and brilliant researcher/writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle of the old school. He also denigrates the empirical work being done by the Circle of the Silver Cord. This professor exhibits professional ignorance about what is happening in the world to-day in empirically validated communication experiments with afterlife entities. He, like other closed minded skeptics, has NOT done any research at all and rudely spouts his negative prejudice to satisfy his own negative partiality. I call that professional negligence. Will he prove to be a coward or will he show he has the moral courage to stand up for what he wrote against the validity of the paranormal?

***********************

DEPENDENT VARIABLE? When J Zwinge R who claims to have been a stage magician emailed me a couple of years ago he implied that he was qualified to do experiments and test psychics using empirical methods. I tested him by asking him what was a 'dependent variable' in empirical testing. He said he would reply to me. Seven years later, I am still waiting for his answer!!

'The Ultimate Psychic Challenge' was filmed in London recently, early August, in 'London Television Studios.' Zwinge Randi, the notorious closed minded skeptic was caught cheating and trying to deceive and con the public that he was a medium. His performance to cheat, mislead and deceive was so bad, so embarrassing, the producers had to stop the show - this segment edited out, otherwise the show would be perceived as absolute rubbish. Zwinge Randi some are now claiming to be the biggest laughing stock in the history of psychic phenomena - read a report by one of the most incisive psi assessors in the world and who has the highest credibility MONTAGUE KEEN: read more...

A FUNNY WAY ON HOW TO DEBUNK JUST ABOUT ANYTHING
1. Before commencing to debunk, prepare your equipment. Equipment needed: one armchair.
2. Put on the right face. Cultivate a condescending air that suggests that your personal opinions are backed by the full faith and credit of God. Employ vague, subjective, dismissive terms such as ‘ridiculous’ or "trivial" in a manner that suggests they have the full force of scientific authority.
3. Portray science not as an open-ended process of discovery but as a holy war against unruly hordes of quackery- worshipping infidels. Since in war the ends justify the means, you may fudge, stretch or violate the scientific method, or even omit it entirely, in the name of defending the scientific method.
4. Keep your arguments as abstract and theoretical as possible. This will "send the message" that accepted theory overrides any actual evidence that might challenge it--and that therefore no such evidence is worth examining.
5.Reinforce the popular misconception that certain subjects are inherently unscientific. In other words, deliberately confuse the *process* of science with the *content* of science. (Someone may, of course, object that since science is a universal approach to truth-seeking it must be neutral to subject matter; hence, only the investigative *process* can be scientifically responsible or irresponsible. If that happens, dismiss such objections using a method employed successfully by generations of politicians: simply reassure everyone that "there is no contradiction here!"). By Daniel Drasin – he’s is a writer and media producer based in the San Francisco Bay Area.Full report: http://snipurl.com/17que or
http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html

THE 1,000 POUND STERLING CHALLENGE FARCE! Sometime ago some non-entity, he's not a professional, not an investigator, not a medium, not an empiricist, not qualified in any discipline - he's a van driver from England who tried to challenge me when I have a HALF A MILLION DOLLARS challenge to anyone who could show why the Circle of the Silver Cord, inter alia, is not genuine. His challenge was so silly and ridiculous I just gave his stupid 1,000 pounds sterling no time at all – it just fizzled out to nothing. But because the anti-materialization attacker imputed that the members of the Circle of the Silver Cord (COSC) and I are not qualified, for the purpose of informing any new comers to the materialization scene I decided to give information about how qualified the COSC – there are those who were professional law investigators - at least one of them had 20 years intelligence experience, a former police officers, two psychologists with formal qualifications in Scientific Method, a retired attorney with expertise in the admissibility of evidence, a tough journalist, one medium – and others – probably the most professional materialization investigation group in the history of empirical materializations. Read more about this uninformed skeptic ...

BREAKING THE HOUDINI CODE: What evidence is there to show that Houdini transmitted the agreed code from the afterlife to his wife?

Victor: Houdini was a crusader against fake mediums early last century – but vowed that if there is an afterlife, on crossing over he would transmit a message by way of a code to his wife Beatrice. And the agreed code did come through! There were a number of people present including reporters from “The Scientific American”, Houdini’s wife and other witnesses. Houdini’s code word related from the afterlife was BELIEVE – as you will read in the article, it was a rather complex message. And the code word from Houdini’s mother related from the afterlife was ‘FORGIVE’. Houdini’s wife Beatrice stated that no one else in the world knew about the code. She signed a formal statement to the effect that the code came from Houdini and was absolutely correct. Naturally the closed minded, aggressive skeptics went on a rampage, using violent tactics to claim that Beatrice was lying and the medium was fraudulent. But to no avail. Houdini’s wife Beatrice stood by what she experienced. ... Read more... (The latest: At the moment, there is a private committee in the United States trying to investigate his cause of death in the 1920's - even trying to exhume his body -- one of the skeptical debunkers claiming he was poisoned by the 'Spiritualists' - and even very naively trying to blame Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for his murder!!!!!)