The Book 4th Edition
‘Very shortly we will be giving scientific explanation
for every known psychic phenomenon’.
A promise made by the skeptics in 1900 A.D.—over
100 years ago.
We are still waiting.
As at 2,006 A.D. closed-minded skeptics:
• have failed to scientifically rebut the argument
for the existence of just one psychic phenomenon
• have failed to prove their assumption that life
after death does not exist
• have failed to show that skepticism itself is not
subject to complete invalidation.
Their successes?
• they have been able to retard—but not stop—
knowledge of psychic phenomena
• because of vested interests and huge monetary profits,
they have been able to find wealthy sponsors—orthodoxy
and the materialists—to finance anti-psychic crusaders
at universities and in the media
• they have been able to unfairly and savagely censor
publication of information about successful investigation
of psychic phenomena
• some have lied, cheated, used vicious propaganda
and malicious tactics to try to unfairly denigrate, defame,
discredit and destroy the characters of some of the greatest
geniuses of science and literature this world has seen who
investigated and accepted psychic phenomena
• they have been able to obtain allies in the conservative
establishment to protect taxpayers' funding in dead-end
jobs, dead-end university research projects, dead end materialist
programs
• some have been able to infiltrate organized psychic
research societies to deliberately neutralize any genuine
psychic finding.
On the other hand, the genuine psychic researchers:
• have obtained repeatable physical scientific evidence
for psychic phenomena and the afterlife
• have attained unprecedented success in the dissemination
of information about psychic phenomena throughout the world
particularly via the Internet
• are using high technology to show through EVP and
ITC the existence of the afterlife and other psychic phenomena
• have made huge progress in Near Death Experiences
showing that even when the brain is completely dead, the
NDEr was able to recall instructions of the medical specialists
operating on her.
•have been able to continuously refine the objective
evidence for the afterlife, especially in the areas of EVP,
ITC, laboratory induced phenomenon, the aura, poltergeists
and in direct communication
• can attest that throughout the world more direct
personal revelations from the afterlife are being made to
millions about the existence of the afterlife.
There is an ongoing exponential growth in the acceptance
of psychic phenomena and the afterlife. It is now estimated
that at least 90% of all people on Earth accept the existence
of some form of afterlife.
The evidence presented in the previous chapters including
EVP, ITC, Computer Analysis of Voice Prints, the Psychic
Laboratory Experiments, Mediums, Frederick Myers Correspondences,
Proxy Sittings, Near Death Experiences, Out of Body Experiences,
Apparitions, the Ouija Board, Xenoglossy, Poltergeists and
Reincarnation shows conclusively that there is overwhelming
proof for the existence of the afterlife.
All these phenomena can be explained by the participation
of intelligences from the afterlife, or in the cases of
the OBE and the NDE, by the fact that we do have an invisible
etheric body within our physical body that becomes our true
'body' once we physically die.
The afterlife has nothing to do with religion or with beliefs
or superstition. The afterlife is now scientifically established.
Those who refuse to investigate or rebut the voluminous
available objective evidence have no technical right or
authority to deny its existence or to make any valid comments
about it.
Analogy with a murder trial
When materialists and closed-minded skeptics refuse to
accept the objective evidence for the afterlife I am reminded
of a courtroom scene. Imagine that the police prosecutor
in a case of murder has brought in one hundred witnesses.
All of these witnesses are highly accredited scientists,
doctors, lawyers, writers, psychiatrists, psychologists,
physicists and many others. All of the witnesses state that
they actually saw the accused pull the trigger
and shoot the victim five times in the chest.
Then the defense lawyer stands up and argues the debunkers'
argument:
• all the prosecution witnesses are hallucinating
• they were all hypnotized
• they are all in collusion with the prosecutor
• alternatively all of these witness are projecting
their own guilt onto the accused
• these witnesses exteriorized their own extra energy
collectively which really killed the victim
• (and if all else fails) it was super ESP.
Imposing a different standard of
proof
From my experience I find that the closed-minded skeptics
are applying to evidence for the “paranormal”
a totally unrealistic standard which is different to the
tests applied by the courts and by science in other areas
such as the safety of medical treatments and drugs.
1. The impossible to pass test
Over the last one hundred and fifty years psychic history
has shown that there is a core group of critics who will
not accept that psychic phenomena can exist. These closed-minded
materialists apply a test that will guarantee the psychic
phenomena being investigated will not be accepted under
any circumstances.
The test, also called the 'I will not believe in the afterlife
even if you can prove it to me’ test, is applied by
those materialists working for the establishment who investigate
psychic phenomena. As “investigators” they become
the prosecutors, judge and jury who make sure that those
who are producing genuine psychic phenomena are accused
of fraud or cheating.
2. Cartesian logic test
From the Catholic Jesuit, Rene Descartes, who today is
ignored by nearly all the people in the world. The Cartesian
test is, 'doubt anything which can be doubted’. The
courts do not apply this test, the Churches do not apply
this test and the materialists do not apply this test when
testing their own beliefs.
3. Beyond reasonable doubt test
This is the test used by the courts to establish the guilt
of a person charged with a criminal offence. The testimony
of one reliable witness is enough to find someone guilty
of murder.
4. On the balance of probabilities
This is another test used by the courts to establish the
liability of parties in a non-criminal, civil matter. It
is obviously a much less stringent test than the criminal
test of beyond reasonable doubt. The Church sometimes uses
this test for its own beliefs since theology is subjective,
personal, and no one can test theology on the basis of beyond
reasonable doubt. It is also the test usually used in medical
research to test the safety of new drugs and in most areas
of science.
5. Prima facie test
The 'on the face of it' test. This is a very weak test.
Circumstantial evidence is permitted to pass this test.
Courts use it in criminal committal proceedings—the
court decides whether a prima facie case has been established
for the matter to be sent to a full hearing. Indirect evidence,
sometimes even hearsay evidence, will be allowed. This is
the test being used by some disciplines, such as psychology.
All introspective psychology is accepted on the basis that
it can establish prima facie that it may be correct.
There are those in orthodoxy, material and religious, who
for vested interests, fraudulently keep on applying test
number one—the impossible to pass test to evidence
for the afterlife while applying far lower levels of proof
in the courts and in medical research.
Yet the evidence for the afterlife is objective, stunning
in its consistency and volume, and taken as a whole amounts
to technical, irrefutable proof. Materialists, debunkers
and closed-minded skeptics have NOT given a credible alternative
explanation for any of the above-demonstrated afterlife
phenomena.
In the absence of a credible alternative explanation, society
has no alternative but to accept that the afterlife exists
and that we will all inevitably experience it.
<<
Previous Chapter : Book
Index : Next Chapter >>
|
