most popular objections quashed
was a significant demand by readers to know more how
skeptics have been rebutted. Over the last 20 years of investigating
the afterlife I had some aggressive closed- minded skeptics
from Australia and other places in UK, US and Europe making
objections to the validity of the evidence for the existence
of the afterlife. The answers to the objections will tell
you why the skeptics are rapidly losing credibility. Hereinafter
are some of the most popular objections I came across these
last two decades.
“The afterlife evidence does not exist. It is similar
to saying you cannot prove there is no green cheese on the
moon.” (Allegation of ‘proving the negative’)
For years a lot of UNINFORMED skeptics swallowed that pernicious
propaganda hook, line and sinker. That is also an inadmissible
objection because it not consistent with the rules of professional
debate. Secondly, there is no one on earth making a claim
that there is green cheese on the moon, but there are scientists
and lawyers who are stating there is an afterlife. When
I, as the plaintiff lawyer presented some twenty three different
areas of the afterlife evidence proving the afterlife exists
(on line), the onus shifts on to the defendant skeptical
lawyer to show where, when, how and why the evidence is
not to be admitted. That has NEVER been done. It has never
been done because no lawyer, no scientist, no philosopher
is able to rebut objectivity and repeatability. You will
read a lot of rubbish, a lot of nonsense, a lot of sarcasm
that there is no afterlife evidence, BUT no genius closed
minded skeptic or scientist, no genius materialist or anybody
else has ever rebutted the evidence for the afterlife as
presented in my book for the last 12 years. Get it?
“The afterlife experiments are fraudulent”.
That is another example of the closed minded skeptics’
pernicious propaganda – and that objection is NOT
admissible for the same reason – it is not consistent
with the requirements of the rules of professional debate.
The objector has to identify WHICH experiments are fraudulent
– to show when, where, how and why the experiments
WHEN CONDUCTED BY SCIENTISTS were fraudulent. To-date no
one on earth has shown that any afterlife experiment which
were conducted by scientists, such as Sir Oliver Lodge,
Sir William Barret, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sir William
Crookes of the past age and those of to-day’s experiments
were fraudulent. I would agree there were charlatans who
tried to cheat the public of their hard earned income. But
that is totally different to the legitimate scientific afterlife
experiments conducted by some of the most brilliant scientists
who ever lived on this earth.
recently, in my own scientific afterlife experiments which
I repeated weekly for 15 months - when some closed minded
skeptic said there has to be fraud to be getting the brilliant
results I was getting with David Thompson, I said - and
I put it on my website for 12 months-, “OK. I will
hand over $500,000 to you – and to other skeptics
- if you could show where the fraud is. But if and when
you fail, YOU will hand over the $500,000 to us. I never
heard from that skeptic or from other skeptics ever again!
All the closed minded skeptics did was to cowardly vent
their frustration in a couple of skeptical websites- but
did not have the moral courage to get in touch with me.
Further, it is the skeptical materialists who have been
caught cheating and negatively manipulating experiments
to willfully try to bring negative empirical paranormal
“Psychic Phenomena cannot be duplicated on demand”.
That’s absolute nonsense. I repeated the empirical
experiments on weekly basis for 15 months: – I followed
a formula, I repeated the experiment over time and space,
keeping variables constant, and I obtained the same successful
results. The Windbridge Institute also had similar repeatable
afterlife scientific experiments and other scientists individually
obtained successful results doing experiments on demand.
“What’s the point of trying to rebut the afterlife
evidence when I know there is no afterlife?”
That is another inadmissible objection because of the assumption
that ‘there is no afterlife’ has never been
proved but that the existence of the afterlife has been
proven. As I stated many times, no genius materialist or
skeptic or anybody else has ever shown in this world where,
when, how and why the afterlife evidence is not valid. Further,
a BELIEF that the afterlife does NOT exist is not supported
by science. The belief that there is no afterlife is a personal
belief which is in itself subjective. And anything subjective
in this world, including the belief that there is no afterlife
can be absolutely wrong. But where the evidence for the
afterlife has been empirically proven, no one can beat empirical
objectivity and repeatability.
“Your evidence is no better than our (skeptics’)
claim that there is no afterlife”
WRONG! The evidence for the afterlife is now empirically
proven. You as a skeptic have only a personal, subjective
‘BELIEF’ that there is no afterlife. In empirical
(scientific) methodology, whenever there is an inconsistency
between the empirical and a personal belief, the empirical
prevails and will ALWAYS prevail over personal beliefs.
This means that your personal belief that there is no afterlife
is made nugatory – is negated – by an identical
claim which is empirically based, that there IS an afterlife.
Get it? So many closed minded skeptics, materialists AND
theologians do not want to understand this truism which
is accepted universally: science negates personal beliefs.
To give the classic example: a personal, religious Christian
theological personal belief was for some sixteen hundred
years that the earth was the center of the universe –
a ‘personal belief.’ Galileo said science says
the earth is NOT in the center of the universe- the Church
also erroneously adhering to the ‘geocentric’
view of the solar system - that it is the sun which revolves
around the earth. But science won over the religious beliefs
and now ALL Christians around the world from the Vatican
to every little tiny place in the world accepts –
the heliocentric view of the solar system - that science
negates theological and other personal ‘beliefs’.
So my empirical, scientific evidence is superior to and
negates your personal, subjective skeptical belief that
there is no afterlife.
Victor’s website and youtubes: www.victorzammit.com