Return to Articles
PROVING 'THE NEGATIVE’
by Victor Zammit
That flamboyant closed minded skeptic from Florida Randi
for years mistakenly stated that , “no one can prove
Victor Zammit’s afterlife evidence because ‘no
one can prove the negative.’!!
That is irrelevant in professional debate.
Why? Because this closed minded skeptic- shows he is clearly
ignorant of the professional debating rules - saying that
he ‘cannot prove that the afterlife does not exist.’
That statement is immediately made INVALID when I presented
some 23 areas of afterlife EVIDENCE for the existence of
This uninformed closed-minded skeptic was NOT asked to prove
that 'there is no afterlife', but to properly rebut
the expressly stated 20 areas of afterlife evidence I presented.
It is either sheer skeptical idiocy - or this guy knowingly
and deliberately wants to mislead and fool the readers and
journalists. He is well known for his 'Machivellian' principle
he uses - 'the end justifies the means' - to lie, cheat,
be dishonest as long as you can fool the public. But not
every journalist and member of the public are stupid - and
unexpectedly, I'm getting huge amount of 'sympathy' votes
by those who were not committed either way - they can see
the dirty tricks of the Florida closed minded skeptic..
This closed- minded skeptic does NOT have
to prove anything – all he has to do is to rebut MY
evidence- WHERE, WHEN, HOW and WHY the evidence I presented
is not right. Further, there is not only my evidence I presented,
there are at least a thousand investigators around the world
who produced their own afterlife evidence.
Also there have been some of the most intelligent
scientists and professionals who walked on this planet earth
early last century (Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Barrett,
Sir William Crookes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle et al) (see
chapter 2 in my book A LAWYER PRESENTS THE CASE FOR THE
AFTERLIFE) who AFTER they empirically investigated the afterlife,
they conceded the afterlife evidence is absolutely irrefutable.
So that the statement that no one can prove
the afterlife does not exist (no one can prove the negative)
is absolutely irrelevant, immaterial, inadmissible and invalid.
Only some uninformed skeptics in Europe
– in Italy, a few in Austria and a couple in Denmark
have not woken up to professional debate to drop the absolute
idiocy ‘you can’t prove the negative.’
This skeptical guy JR will be remembered for uttering
the most idiotic statement about the afterlife evidence.