Report for subscribers
last week's report)
I am still very, very busy. Please be patient if I have
not replied to your email.
COMMENTARY: As a professional debater, it is
for me to independently substantiate my evidence for the
afterlife. As I stated some years ago, any lawyer who
negotiates with empirical, objective evidence will ALWAYS
win his case. That is why in my book A Lawyer Presents
the Case for the Afterlife I have focused on the areas
of evidence that are repeatable, objective and empirical.
Evidence of the Pye experiments in EVP conducted under
strict laboratory conditions; research into mediums done
by the leading scientists in the world over many years,
scientific research into remote viewing and much much
more - twenty three areas of objective evidence. No one
on earth, no scientist, no skeptical debunker can or will
ever be in a position to rebut hard core objective, repeatable
empirical evidence: that is why my evidence on the internet
for the last eight years has never been rebutted! See
by Dianne Archangel
the best evidence of after death communication is that
ordinary people have been experiencing them since the
beginning of recorded history. In this book, Dianne Arcangel
reveals the results of her five-year international survival
study by using real stories from real people. But far
from being simply anecdotal the book also approaches the
experiences with an eye to evidence. She lists experiences
according to six conditions:
1. The apparition conveys information unknown at the time
to the perceiver.
2. More than one person at the same time is a witness.
3. The apparition was unknown but later identified.
4. The apparition reported a current event that was unknown
to the perceiver and later verified.
5. The apparition moved a physical object.
6. The apparition had its own clear purpose.
The book is extremely well referenced and contains a marvelous
bibliography of supportive resources.
CHILDREN WHO DIE USUALLY MAKE CONTACT
Several studies have found that a very high proportion
of parents of children who die can expect to see or hear
them and experience great consolation within a few months
of the child's death. Dr Melvin
Morse, a pediatrician who has done extensive studies of
death and dying, claims that they are so common that it
is rare for someone to lose a parent or child and not
see them again in a death-related vision (Morse 1994:
PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE AFTERLIFE SHIFTS ATHEISTS:
Richard, someone I’ve known for thirty years, told
me recently of his most fascinating
experience. “My partner’s nine year old son,
Tim, died a few years ago. I was speaking to her on the
telephone when suddenly a noisy buzz was heard –
then immediately Tim’s voice came in from the afterlife
dimension and said, ‘Hi Mom.. I’m all right’
in a sharp, clear voice that was definitely Tim. Then
another noisy buzz was heard and we were back on the line.
This was a truly fascinating experience because both my
partner and I had a long experience of not believing in
anything supernatural or in the afterlife. But she had
other personal experiences which gave her definitive proof
that her own son is well and happy. This was crucial in
helping her to accept the evidence for the afterlife.
And now, after reading your book, Victor, she has no doubt
at all that there is an afterlife and that she will be
reunited with her son when she crosses over.” That
says it all!!! .
I'M AS FINE AS A DEAD ONE CAN BE
Dr Mark Macy writes on his website about his favorite
phone call from beyond: " But I suppose my favorite
all-time joking in an ITC contact was when the famous
EVP pioneer Konstantin Raudive called AA-EVP founder
Sarah Estep on the phone in 1994, twenty years after his
death. When a surprised Sarah heard the voice of her deceased
colleague, she exclaimed, "Dr. Raudive, how are you?"
And Konstantin replied, "I'm as fine as a 'dead one'
can be. Dear Sarah, thank you for all the work you've
done...." And the conversation continued from that.
To listen to sample ITC contacts go to http://www.worlditc.org/
and choose "Sample Contacts".
GREATEST SCIENTIST OF HIS TIME SIR WILLIAM CROOKES ACCEPTED
THE AFTERLIFE AFTER HE INVESTIGATED, “I
didn’t say that it was possible. I just said that
it (materialization) happened.”! These are the most
stunning credentials, showing the quality of the scientists
who have investigated the afterlife: President of the
Royal Society; LL.D (Birm.) D.Sc(Oxon); Camb.; Ireland;
Cape of Good Hope; Sheffield; Durham; Foreign Secretary
Royal Society 1908-12; President Chemical Society; British
Association; Institute of Electrical Engineering; Soc.Chem.Industry;
Hon Mem Royal Phil.Soc. Glasgow Royal Society; N.S.W.
Pharm.Soc.; Chem. Metal & Mining Soc. of South Africa;
Amer.Chem.Soc.; Amer. Philos.Soc.; Royal Soc. Sci. Upsala;
Deutsch Chem. Gesell Berlin; Psychol.Soc Paris; Antonio
Alzate Sci.Soc.; Mexico Sci.Soc.; Bucharest Reg.; Accad
Zetanli; Foreign Mem. Linccei rome; Corresp.Ins.de France
(Acad.Lincei Rome); Corr. Inst. de France (Acad.Sci.);
Coressp.Mem Bataafsch; Genoots; Rotterdam Soc. de'Encrouragement
pour L'Ind.Paris; For.Assoc. Natioinal Acad, Sciences
Washington; Foreign Member of the Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences Washington; Foreign Member of the Royal Swedish
Academy of Sciences; Royal Medalist Day Medalist; Copley
Medalist and three times Bakerian Lecturer of the Royal
Society; Proprietor and Editor of Chemical News.
The difference between empirical afterlife
investigators and closed minded skeptics is that the former
affirm that their evidence can be proved by investigation
whereas the closed minded skepticism argument cannot be
verified by investigation. It relies on "faith"
in an outmoded view of science.
LAUREATE PROFESSOR CHARLES RICHET, "To admit
telekinesis and ectoplasms is not to destroy even the
smallest fragment of science; it is but to admit new data,
and that there are unknown energies. Then why be indignant,
when, on the basis of thousands of observations and experiments,
we affirm one of those unknown energies?"
Michael Tymn has presented his research on Dr Richet's
book Thirty Years of Psychical Research as an
interview...highly recommended. Read
MARGARET MEAD, “The whole history of scientific
advance is full of scientists investigating phenomena
that the establishment did not believe were there.”
QUESTION: WHY DO YOU HAVE
SO MANY PICTURES ON YOUR HOMEPAGE? Debbie, L.A.
I’m glad you asked that question Debbie. I had a
just now and counted more than forty pictures of some
of the world’s most intelligent people, including
scientists, doctors, paranormal investigators, lawyers,
judges and mediums- who after investigating– all
accepted the existence of the afterlife. A lawyer experienced
in litigation and all judges would see that a ‘prima
facie’ case (on the face of it) for the existence
of the afterlife has been made out even BEFORE even the
evidence is examined!
DEMONSTRATIONS AGAINST NEW BRITISH
LAWS Mediums and spiritual healers marched
on the home of the British prime minister at Downing Street
on Friday to protest against new laws they fear will lead
to them being "persecuted and prosecuted". Organizers
say that replacing the Fraudulent Mediums Act of 1951
with new consumer protection rules will remove key legal
protection for "genuine" mediums They think
skeptics might bring malicious prosecutions to force spiritualists
to prove in court that they can heal people, see into
the future or talk to
the dead Psychics also fear they will have to give disclaimers
describing their services as entertainment or as scientific
experiments with unpredictable results.
of our readers contacted me last week about the Kennedy-Lincoln
synchronicities. He writes:
" At least one of the coincidences referred to is
claimed to be false. While Kennedy did indeed have a secretary
named Evelyn Lincoln, there was no one in the Lincoln
White House named Kennedy. According to Carl Sandberg's
definitive Lincoln biography, Lincoln had two
secretaries; John Hay and John George Nicolay. I have
heard of this supposed coincidence before, but I have
no idea where the notion came from that Lincoln had a
secretary named Kennedy." Any comment from historians?
‘BEYOND THE INDIGO CHILDREN’
by Dr P.M H. ATWATER
the first major study of today's children, and
their place in our rapidly changing world, that combines
objective research with mystical revelation and prophecy.
In the book, Dr. Atwater illuminates
the talents and weaknesses of these brilliant and irreverent
kids born since around 1982. Her webpage contains a great
deal of fascinating additional material. Essential reading
for parents and educators is her argument that "Virtual
realities of any type -- cell phones, gameboys, video
games, television - directly interfere with the normal
stages of brain development. Kids grow up smart and know
a lot, but that incredible ability they once had to abstract,
to think outside the box, to indulge in creative, intuitive
leaps of imagination and promise, are either gone or nearly
so." Go to http://www.pmhatwater.com/
And choose BEYOND THE INDIGO CHILDREN EXTRAS
FRY PHYSICAL MEDIUM
Many people who are familiar with Colin Fry on television
as a mental medium
are not familiar with Colin's earlier work as a physical
medium using the pseudonym "Lincoln". Robin
Foy's book "In
Pursuit of Physical Mediumship (1996) gives many fascinating
stories of the young Colin who developed quickly as a
deep trance medium and then a physical medium. One of
the most interesting (on p.254) is the effect that a sitting
with Colin had on another physical medium, Stewart Alexander,
who had the opportunity to realize perhaps for the first
time the wonderful uplifting effect that good physical
mediumship can have on those privileged to witness it.
He subsequently wrote: "Those loving, understanding
and patient people from the world of spirit look to us
all to prove the great truth to a disbelieving world!
That one weekend transformed my very being..."
Next week we will have a report of a recent public physical
seance given by Stewart Alexander in Switzerland.
DID JESUS REALLY TEACH?: see St.Matthew’s
gospel: Using the Catholic Church’s own theology,
here was a critical situation where a commoner asked Jesus
– what Catholic Church claims is ‘God’
- what must he do about salvation. Jesus’ answer
was: not to murder, not to commit adultery, not to steal,
not to bear false witness, honor thy father and mother
and love thy neighbor as thyself. THAT IS ALL WHAT JESUS
STATED!! This was a direct question from an average person
with a direct answer from ‘God’. Now, why
would the Catholic Church ADD more conditions to get a
good deal in the afterlife Jesus did not think were necessary
– for example, a woman who remarries, eating a ham
sandwich on Fridays (now this silly directive has been
abolished); not attending Church on Sundays and there
are so many other unnecessary conditions. No, I am NOT
against Christianity, NOT against religion – what
you do is your business, but I am against irrationality,
against unauthorized additions in theology and against
unfairness and injustice.
SERVICE THE GREAT RELIGION
are the heralds of the new world which must prevail so
that there can be driven from your earth the greed, avarice
and selfishness that form the malignant cancers in far
too many places. We enthrone service as the greatest of
all religions, mutual helpfulness, tolerance, compassion
to all, human or animal, so that you can truly hav, if
you so desire, a kingdom of heaven on earth." S.
Birch "More Philosophy".
OPRAH CONFRONTS THE FUNDAMENTALISTS
seems that Oprah Winfrey is upsetting some Christian fundamentalists
especially with her support of Eckhardt Tolle. Check out
these short videos:
Most Dangerous Woman.
Oprah has responded by creating her own channel on Youtube:
BEFORE YOU FORWARD THAT FUNNY VIDEO
OR EMAIL PETITION....
Every week we receive anxious petitions
and warnings from well intentioned readers. However before
you waste precious time and energy please check
out the title with the word hoax next to it in Google.
There are also a number of excellent hoaxbusters pages
online like this one...http://www.hoax-slayer.com/
There are many versions of "The Interview
with God" on the internet.. but this one is truly